Australian Customs Disaster
A new Integrated Customs System (ICS) introduced last month by the
Australian Customs Service, at a taxpayers cost of $A250 million (US$188
million), with the purpose of speeding up freight processing, has had
the opposite effect.
ICS has been plagued with problems every since it was introduced. The
system has led to shipments that used to be cleared within a day taking
up to two weeks.
At press time, consignments were still stranded at Australian ports and
airports after the new system started automatically rejecting en masse
electronic clearance requests generated by shippers due to poor data
quality.
While the Customs department has spent the better part of the last two
years warning the industry that its new system would automatically
reject any numerical variation in electronic clearance documentation, it
appears that both Australian Customs and the Australian freight
forwarding industry greatly underestimated just how strict the new data
requirements would be.
“Debacle is a kind word in describing the past two weeks,” Scott Rofe,
managing director of Flag Seawing in Sydney and a member of the
Aeroceanetwork Group, was quoted as saying in a statement. “The general
brokerage and freight community consensus is that the system should be
shut down and we revert back to the old system, which is only about four
years old anyway.”
The Aeroceanetwork statement further said that members throughout
Australia had been pushing forward under “friendly fire” during the
customs computer crisis, which for three weeks crippled Australian ports
and airports. Although the situation slowly appeared to be easing, the
backlog of freight is several days, maybe up to a month by some
estimates, away from being cleared up and business returning to
normality.
Meanwhile, the Australian Customs Service also blamed delays in
arranging transport for contributing to freight congestion at the
country’s sea ports. Cargo industry leaders also have been pleading with
forwarders and consignees to help in clearing the backlog at their
facilities as well.
“All four of our terminals (Perth, Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney), are
at critical capacity levels and delays in the collection of freight will
have a major impact, particularly in Melbourne and Sydney,” said Robert
Lugton, general manager of freight terminals for Qantas, in a statement
to customers.
Earlier Lugton had asked Qantas customers to “use all options of
clearance available to them, including the manual contingency under bond
movement request option” especially in Sydney and Melbourne, as terminal
space was at the critical level.
According to Federal Customs Minister Chris Ellison, much of the backlog
was expected to be cleared by the end of October, though many forwarders
and customs agents were skeptical about this assertion. In the meantime
the old computer systems have been dusted off and worked alongside the
Integrated Customs System until these problems are fixed.
Regarding any upcoming claims for damages against customs for the
colossal backlog, the current situation in Australian ports and airports
is a “user pays” system, so the end cost goes directly to the importer.
This includes extra time spent trying to clear goods through the ICS/CMR
systems.
Unfortunately, major costs for forwarders and their clients have been
incurred. “We have paid out large sums on behalf of our clients,” said a
CT Freight representative, “and will be passing this to our customers.”
Without pointing fingers, it might be an idea if Customs and the
forwarding industry were to share some of these costs. It is clear that
shippers have been poorly instructed how to use this critical new
system.
To Return to the News Page
To Return to the Home Page
|